telephone.In myexpenence,face-to-face interactions are best for a number of reasons.In thefirst place,when you hear the speaker's tone of voice,you are better able tojudge
the attitude andemotions that can be easily hidden in a written reply.In addition,the exchangeis more immediate.Even instant messaging isn't as fast as a verbal interactionin
person or byphone.E-mail seems efficient;however, sometimes multiple messages over severaldays are required to clarify the information that a short phone call would have
taken care of in onecommunication.We have all tried to return a voice mail only to hear a recordingon the original caller's voice mail. Clearly,no real communication is
possible in asituation that only allows one person to talk.Moreover,the body language andthe expression on the speaker's face often communicate more than the words
themselves.Researchindicates that more than 80 percent of a message is nonverbal.The way that aspeaker stands or sits can indicate interest or disagreement.The eye contact
and the movement ofthe eyebrows and the mouth can actually communicate the opposite of the wordsthat the speaker is saying. Finally,no technology has succeeded in
duplicating a firmhandshake to close a deal,a hug to encourage a friend,or a kiss goodbye.UntilE-mail and voice mail can provide the subtle communication,the immediate
interaction,and theemotional satisfaction of a face-to-face conversation,complete with facialexpressions and gestures,I will prefer to talk instead of to type.
The writer prefersface-to-face communication because of the following reasons except________.
A.face-to-facecommunication is more immediate and you can judge the speaker's attitude and emotions
B.you can talk tomany people at the same time in a face-to-face communication
C.nonverbal languageconveys more meaning than verbal language in a communication
D.you can getemotional satisfaction by having physical contact with the person you aretalking to in a face-to-face communication